Thursday, May 25th

Last updateThu, 25 May 2017 11am

You are here: Home Shout it Out Scarsdale's Non-Partisan Party Scores Big Victory in Hotly Contested Election
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

Scarsdale's Non-Partisan Party Scores Big Victory in Hotly Contested Election

slateScarsdale's Non-Partisan Party slate scored a resounding victory in a hotly contested race for Village Mayor and Trustees on Tuesday March 21. In an election that usually draws only 300 voters, 2,854 Scarsdale residents came to the polls and selected the Non-Partisan Party slate by a 2:1 margin. Total votes cast, including absentee ballots were 3,030.

votingThe race put Scarsdale's Non-Partisan system of governance to the test and the results showed that voters, young and old value the Village's unique system. For many it was the first time they had voted in a Village election, but when they realized what was at stake, they stood on long lines to cast their ballots.

Running for the Scarsdale Non-Partisan Party were a slate of candidates with many years of volunteer service to the Village. Dan Hochvert, a former Village Trustee was elected Mayor, Carl Finger and Matt Callaghan were re-elected to serve second terms as Village Trustee and Seth Ross was elected as a new Trustee.

The opposition party was formed in the wake of a marnieVillage-wide tax revaluation that critics charged was poorly executed and yielded skewed results. In fact, two of the candidates on the Scarsdale Voters' Choice Party slate had participated in an Article 78 lawsuit against the Village, charging that the 2016 tax roll should be voided.

The campaigns for both parties were led by younger women who brought leadership, new tactics and a new generation into the fight . ML Perlman, the next President of the Scarsdale Forum served as campaign chair for the Non-Partisan Party, while Mayra Kirkendall-Rodriguez chaired the Scarsdale Voters' Choice Party.

During the course of the long day of voting, no one seemed at all sure which way the vote would go. As more and more voters surged to the polls, it was difficult to discern what the outcome would be.

However, at 11 pm, after the votes were counted, it appeared that the Scarsdale Voters'  Choice Party's calls for increased transparency, lower taxes and new roads failed to draw enough voters to overturn the status quo.

Here are the vote counts: (including absentee ballots)

VoteTabulation

What motivated voters? Though there was no exit polling, here are a few reasons voters gave for their decisions. The Scarsdale Voters' Party attracted 1,000 voters, triple the number of voters in a regular election. They promised minimal tax increases and better roads. This was an appealing message to those who feel their taxes are too high.  However, Berg had many opponents as well. Some remembered that he had objected to the construction of a fitness center at the high school and led a campaign to defeat a school budget. Fearing that he would pressure the schools to cut their budget, they came out to vote for his opponent. Residents at Christie Place objected to Berg's pleas to enact the Homestead Act which would have doubled real estate taxes on condominium owners. Others came out to support non-partisan politics and Scarsdale's non partisan system of governance.

The campaign was noisy and visible. The Village was covered in campaign signs, candidate for Mayor Robert Berg made robo calls to Scarsdale households, there were meetings, mailings and heavy use of social media. In a town where candidates for Village Board and School Board are usually selected by nominating committees, the change was notable. Some voters said they objected to the divisive nature of partisan politics and were inspired to vote to ensure that Scarsdale did not go the way of national politics.

Speaking at the Scarsdale Woman's Club after the results were announced, Dan Hochvert vowed to mend fences and get to work for the Village of Scarsdale. Matt Callaghan called the team "the stewards of the public good," and Seth Ross said, "though we don't always agree, we are all members of a community." Carl Finger promised to be "the best trustee I can be," and Mayor Jon Mark praised the widespread participation and called on residents to volunteer and work for the community they love.

The candidates from the Scarsdale Voters' Party did not attend the post-election celebration and missed the invitation from the Non-Partisan Party to mend fences and put partisan politics behind them.

Comments   

+8 #26 Both sides 2017-03-24 16:40
I am not sure you understand the problem. You run your own business. Many people have good reputation and it can get tarnished if they are wrongly labeled by one of the firebrands on your site.

By the way, I was not aware so many people were silenced!

Quoting Joanne Wallenstein:
Do you want to comment? Please include your name. I do it everyday. I am getting many anonymous comments addressing me by name - you know my name but i don't know yours!
Quote
+7 #25 Joanne Wallenstein 2017-03-24 16:01
You are worried about your reputation? So perhaps you shouldn't say something that you're not comfortable owning up to! What about my reputation and the reputation of the website for publishing anonymous and sometimes hostile attacks on others?
I am sure if you are concerned about YOUR reputation you can see why I am asking you to use your name if you want to comment on MY site.
Thank you!
Joanne
Quote
+5 #24 Joanne Wallenstein 2017-03-24 11:42
Do you want to comment? Please include your name. I do it everyday. I am getting many anonymous comments addressing me by name - you know my name but i don't know yours!
Quote
+4 #23 Joanne Wallenstein 2017-03-24 08:19
A chart with machine votes and absentee ballots has been added to the article above.
Quote
+10 #22 FairandBalanced 2017-03-23 21:40
It is not correct. I received the numbers from the Village Clerk. You can check with her too.

(Quote name="Dave Shuster"]Thanks , but the article says that the 2,854 votes include the absentees.
Quote
+1 #21 Dave Shuster 2017-03-23 20:24
Thanks, but the article says that the 2,854 votes include the absentees.
Quote
+11 #20 FairandBalanced 2017-03-23 19:46
Add 176 absentee ballots

(Quote name="Dave Shuster"]How were 3,011 votes cast for mayor when only 2,854 people voted?
Quote
+1 #19 Dave Shuster 2017-03-23 18:14
How were 3,011 votes cast for mayor when only 2,854 people voted?
Quote
+26 #18 Josh Frankel 2017-03-23 07:48
Jeff & Bruce:

Thanks for your commentary. I'm happy to continue this dialogue, but beginning to think that it might be best to do so privately, as the level of animus here - for no good reason - is a bit disturbing, and I'm not going to change anyone's mind about anything, facts be damned. Folks know what they know, and that's that. It's like a mini-Fox News in here.

Jeff, you've got every which way to reach me, so let's chat when it's convenient - it's been too long since we've caught up.

Bruce, I'm at j(underscore)fr ankel(at)me.com .
Quote
-13 #17 Bruce Wells 2017-03-22 22:47
Josh,

You need to understand what lower taxes means: lower services. If you would like to run as a candidate for office and say you will lower taxes, you need to specify what you will cut. I grew up in Wellesley MA. Very similar to Scarsdale in terms wealth, education, housing stock, etc. But taxes were much lower. And every Saturday, we loaded the trash cans into the back of the Mercedes and drove them to the dump. Scarsdale could do the same. You want to run on that platform? Good luck in this town.

Until then, the non-partisan system works well. If you don't like it, please get involved and help make it better. I have. Please join me.
Quote

Add comment

first
  
last
 
 
start
stop