Scarsdale Schools Registrar Enforces Strict New Residency Requirements
- Category: Schools
- Published on 24 April 2017
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
At the end of the 2016 school year the Board of Education adopted new rules concerning registration of students in the district. Policy 5152, title "Admission of Non-Resident Students," was debated at length by the Board of Education and the Superintendent because it stipulated the conditions under which residents, who were moving into and out of the district or renovating their homes, would be required to pay tuition to have their children remain in school.
This enforcement of this new set of rules came as a surprise to new and existing residents as well as some realtors who found that if their clients were not in their homes by the start of the school year, they would be required to pay a full year of tuition.
At the same time, parents who were separated or divorced received inquiries from the District Registrar about their domestic and custodial arrangements.
Why this change? In the March 16th issue of the 'Dale Dispatch' Scarsdale Schools Superintendent Thomas Hagerman provided the following explanation for the new policy. He said, "Another aspect of this centralization of registration that has gotten some attention from the community is the verification of residency that is required when families move, have outdated leases or other paperwork, or have disruptions in family life such as divorce or separation. Although many people believe that owning or renting a property in Scarsdale is sufficient for school attendance, New York law dictates that physical residency is actually the standard, so this does need to be confirmed, sometimes along with custodial arrangements. While we understand this can seem intrusive, particularly to families in transition, we do have an obligation both legally and to our taxpayers, to ensure that students in our schools live in Scarsdale .... Unfortunately, there are more nonconforming residency situations than most people realize, representing thousands of dollars of cost to the families and taxpayers of Scarsdale."
Separated and Divorced Parents
Helen Morey, a Heathcote resident and mother of two school-age boys, grew alarmed, when shorty before the Christmas holiday in December, she received a letter from the district demanding verification of her custody arrangements within four days. In her own words, here are her thoughts on the actions of the district.
"After receiving a demand letter from the Scarsdale Superintendent to provide my entire divorce decree within the 5 business days before Christmas, 2016, else be subject to 'a full investigation', I contacted the office. After much argument back and forth, Dr. Hagerman finally and formally accepted a signed affidavit of custody sufficient to preserve my children's Scarsdale residency and attendance in the Scarsdale School District.
Subsequently, I contacted several individuals across the NY State Board of Education and related Albany offices and found that Scarsdale schools are not following several legal protocols designed to protect students and families, including:
1. Posting the complete list of documents and criteria publicly (on the web site, etc.) to prove residency in the case of new residents, relocating within the village residents, or divorcing residents.
2. School districts are explicitly NOT permitted to require submission of a judicial custody order or order of guardianship - the exact document that Dr. Hagerman's office initially demands and prefers. Only an affidavit is legally allowed.
3. While school districts have the individual right to charge tuition and a requirement to make a determination within 4 business days, school districts do NOT have the right to demand the tuition be paid in full within those same 4 days else threaten to remove a child from school such as happens here in Scarsdale. In fact, the findings have a 4 day window and following that school districts must publish and adhere to the state laws regarding a contested finding, only at the conclusion of which could tuition be demanded should the district succeed in it's decision and motion.
Lastly, it seems odd that the role of a district superintendent should be so consumed with the pursuit of residency proof, including the hiring and management of a private detective force. I would like to understand from the Scarsdale Board of Education what the specific remit is for the office that would make such work the focus at the expense of further improving and streamlining our school system."
Newcomers to Scarsdale
While it used to be enough to have a contract of sale to enroll children in school in the summer, for those moving in after the first day of school, the district is now requiring proof of the house closing and of residency.
Here is the new rule:
A child whose parents have contracted to buy or leased an apartment, house or condominium in the District, but have not moved into the District, may attend the school of the District for up to three months, upon the payment of tuition.
A mother of three children who moved here from California in the late summer had a contract of sale but was not able to actually move in to her house until September 30th. In order to enroll, the district required the family to pay an entire year of tuition for each of the children up front, with the promise of a pro-rata refund upon closing. This was a considerable hardship for the family who had just used up their resources to purchase a house. But that was not all. Even when they had closed the district sought to verify that they were in the house. The woman was outraged when District Registrar Maria Miraglia appeared at her door to inspect the house to confirm that they had actually moved in. When there did not appear to be sufficient furniture on the first floor, she demanded that she be allowed upstairs to check the beds. The resident found this level of intrusion objectionable and refused the request.
Moving Out While Renovating
Another new provision, specific to Scarsdale, that residents should keep in mind pertains to temporarily moving out of your home while it is under renovation.
Here is what the regulation says:
A students whose parents own a house in the District which is unoccupied, may be permitted to attend the schools of the District, without the payment of tuition, for up to one academic year from the date that the house became unoccupied, under the following conditions:
a. The house had been occupied, and resided in, but the student and parents for the three years directly prior to the house become unoccupied and the house is required to be unoccupied for a major home construction or remodeling, and
b. The student's parents continue to own the house throughout the period that the house is unoccupied and do not purchase another residential property.
Therefore, this means that if you decide to renovate a home, and have not already lived there for three years prior to the renovation, you will need to pay tuition while you are out of the house. Both residents and realtors find this new regulation puzzling, as the homeowners are presumably paying real estate taxes on the home that is under renovation, have a valid Scarsdale address and ought to be permitted to send their children to school.
Commenting on the new policies, Anne Moretti, Associate Real Estate Broker with Julia B. Fee Sotheby's said, "The District's new residency requirements need to be more clearly defined and enforcement more carefully handled. Incoming homebuyers with signed purchase contracts should also have some grace period within which they can move in without paying tuition. The District should answer the questions Joanne has outlined in this article, and the community should be better informed on our policies."
We sent Dr. Hagerman a series of questions about this new policy a few weeks ago but have not received a response.
Specifically, here is what we asked the Superintendent:
-In your note in the Dale Dispatch you said, "There are more nonconforming residency situations than most people realize, representing thousands of dollars of cost to the families and taxpayers of Scarsdale."
-Can you tell us how many non-conforming students you found in the schools last year before you instituted the new policy? At what cost to the district?
-The policy for current residents who move out of their home while it is being renovated says that in order not to pay tuition they had to own the home for three years directly prior to the house becoming unoccupied. Why the three year requirement?
-Some divorced parents with joint custody have said that the district requires their children to live at the Scarsdale address for a certain percentage of time in order to attend the schools. Can you elaborate? Is this district or state policy?
-Does the district require divorced parents to provide the district with their divorce agreements and custodial arrangements?
-A few parents have reported that the district has retained private investigators to verify residency in the district. Is that true? If so, what was the cost of that so far this school year?
-In reviewing residency requirements for districts in our area, is the new policy in Scarsdale similar to what you see? Does the district have some discretion on how the law is interpreted?
When we receive responses to the questions we will share them with you. In the interim, we thought it would be helpful to make you aware of these new regulations so that you will not be caught by surprise if your own situation changes.
What do you think of these new policies?
Please comment below and include your first and last names.
Girls Lacrosse Team Faces Challenging Season; Mehlman and Nicholas Each Score 100 Career Goals
- Category: Schools
- Published on 14 April 2017
- Written by Emmeline Berridge
The Scarsdale Varsity Girls Lacrosse team headed into the 2017 season with a radically different approach than last season. Last year the Raiders started the season with an 8-0 record, but failed to make it past the first round of playoffs. This year, instead of tallying easy wins early in the season, the coaches compiled a difficult schedule, planning games with the best competition in the section at the start. As a result, a 2-3 beginning to the season is not as discouraging as it may seem.
The Raiders began their season against Bronxville, the three time Class C section 1 champions. Beginning the game with an early four-point deficit, the Raiders were able to bring the game within two goals going into the second half. The Raiders ultimately lost by five, with a final score of 18-13. As the first game of the season, the team showed potential and recognized their areas for improvement. Junior Lily Steckel and Senior Captain Erin Nicholas stepped up, both totaling three goals and one assist. Senior Captain Jilly Mehlman tallied one goal and two assists. Sophomores Aliza Mehlman, Emma Schwartz, and Chessy Greenwald scored three, two, and one goals respectively. Goalie and Senior Captain Angie Burns had nine saves.
The Raiders went into their second game of the season against Mahopac with a vengeance, as Mahopac knocked them out of the Section Quarterfinals last year. This game, played in pouring rain and gusting wind, was eerily similar to the outcome of last years' matchup. Scarsdale came out strong early, leading by three going into the second half. Scarsdale was still leading 8-5 with eight minutes left in regulation play. A string of Mahopac goals got them up by one, and Scarsdale was unable to come back in the last seconds of possession. The final score was 9-8 Mahopac.
A formidable opponent on Scarsdale's difficult schedule was the defending Section 1 Class A Champions, North Rockland. Although another loss, Scarsdale demonstrated their ability to play in a close game situation against a tough opponent.
Contributions from Sophomore Sam Felder's two goals, Erin Nicholas' two goals, Jilly Mehlman's three goals, Lily Steckel's single goal, and Chessy Greenwald's one goal left the final score at 11-9 in favor of North Rockland. Senior Captain Emma Coleman led the defense with three interceptions. Chessy Greenwald expressed the importance of team camaraderie and cohesiveness in close games. "The North Rockland game showed everyone that we can compete with all of these strong teams, but we have to work together if we want to win. We have talent on the field, but if we don't work together nobody is going to get anything done".
Scarsdale had their first league game against White Plains. The Raiders dominated the game, winning 13-3. Notable offensive contributions included three goals from Lily Steckel, and two from both Erin Nicholas and Aliza Mehlman. Goalie Angie Burns had 14 saves, and the defensive end had a shutout in the first half. Jilly Mehlman netted her 100th career goal during this game, an impressive accolade earned by few High School Varsity players. Jilly had six goals total in the game. Sister Aliza Mehlman assisted three of Jilly's goals.
In their second league game of the season, Scarsdale defeated Ursuline 19-6. In this game Erin Nicholas scored her 100th goal. As it is rare to have one 100-goal scorer on a team, it is even more rare to have two in one senior class. The offensive dominance of Nicholas and Mehlman over the course of their high school careers has been pivotal in Scarsdale's program development and its improved reputation in Section one competition. Lily Steckel had another three goals for the Raiders, and Aliza Mehlman scored four. Steckel noted the importance of these league wins with regards to upcoming games. "It feels great to get these wins under our belts so that we are more confident going into the next few weeks". Scarsdale will face off against Mamaroneck this Tuesday April 18th away at 5 pm. After defeating the Tigers in a thrilling overtime regular season win last year, the Raiders return, hoping for a similar outcome. Steckel notes the potential of the team going forward, "We have the ability to do well this season, and hopefully playing against tougher competition will help us achieve our goals".
Article by Emmeline Berridge, Photos by Jon Thaler: See more here:
Community Groups Weigh in on Proposed 2017-18 School Budget
- Category: Schools
- Published on 29 March 2017
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
The community was invited to respond to the proposed 2017-18 Scarsdale School budget on Monday night March 27th. The budget for the next school year funds 8.4 new teachers along with an additional nurse and two full time cleaning people at the high school, bringing the staff to the highest level it has been in the past eight years. However, due to savings from retirements, decreased contributions to the state retirement fund and stable utility and health insurance costs, the district can fund these additions without passing a big increase onto taxpayers.
The $153.69 mm school budget is a 2.15% budget-to-budget increase and includes funds from reserves from this year's budget to reduce the growth in the tax levy to just .96%. Due to the equalization rate, Scarsdale resident's taxpayers will go up 2.15%.
Response from the community was positive overall. Speaking for the League of Women Voters of Scarsdale, Diane Greenwald encouraged a "Yes" vote on the budget, saying that it adheres to class size maximums, funds growth in the curriculum, accommodates the needs of special education students and allows for the hiring of a second nurse at the high school.
The League cautioned against budgeting to the state tax cap, saying "We recommend you present metrics going further back in Scarsdale budgeting history, when budget growth reflected prudent and justifiable investments that at times were higher than the "2%" limit, which is a misnomer. Educating the community in this way will be critical to getting the necessary approval if and when the Board must request an override of the tax cap to ensure the quality of a Scarsdale education."
For next year, the League asked for the Board to host community forums or provide opportunities for the public to give input on the budget earlier in the process, and asked the administration to provide a draft version of the budget for review before the final budget is released. They recommended that the district report on gifts made to the schools in the budget document. They also urged the Board to advocate for the district on matters such as unfunded mandates, teacher evaluations and other state and national issues affecting public schools.
The full statement from the League is shown below.
Speaking on behalf of the PT Council, Claudine Gecel thanked the school board and administration for a transparent budgeting process. The PT Council supported the addition of reading teachers, a half time Special Education teacher, a STEAM teacher, a nurse, and a part-time speech pathologist. They urged the Board to come up with a facilities plan to address "long neglected facilities issues." See the full statement below.
Newly elected Mayor of Scarsdale Dan Hochvert spoke on behalf of the Scarsdale Forum's Education Committee. He said that the Education Committee could not offer a formal comment on the budget as they had not received a copy until a week ago and were interrupted by the village election. He said he personally agrees with about 90% of what Diane Greenwald said, and requested that an earlier copy of the budget be issued next year for community groups to analyze. He also said he looks forward to seeing a long-range financial plan for the district from the administration.
Sharon Higgins, President of the Scarsdale Middle School PTA spoke on behalf of the SMS PTA Executive Committee and expressed their "mixed feelings" about the new Mandarin classes that will be offered before school in the "zero period."
Here is an excerpt from her statement: "Although our committee is not making a statement for or against the pilot, we would like to raise the question of how the World Language Report from November 28, 2016, in specific the ScarsdaleK-12 households survey and 6-11 survey were utilized in this decision. Priorities from the parent survey ranked STEAM and Technology over World Language and the student survey ranks Mandarin fourth after American Sign Language, Italian and German. We are concerned about the long-term viability of a program and the attendant repercussions to personnel where there is a demonstrated low level of interest and a high attrition rate."
BK Munguia spoke on behalf of the Scarsdale Teen Center, which did not receive funding from the School Board this year. She said that the decision to cu the funding was made by some who had originally supported the founding of the Teen Center. She also noted potential uses for the space at a time when the library will be under construction, saying, "In a community with space issues does it make sense to walk away from a completed community space?" She said that despite the School Board's decision, the Teen Center will continue with the funding they receive from the Village Board and is currently seeking new board members.
In response to commentary, Board President Lee Maude said the Board would think more about the timing of the release of the budget book, reporting on gifts to the district, holding forums on the budget before it is formulated and on the SMS PTA's comments on the new Mandarin program.
After the fireworks over the Village election the prior week, the mood of the meeting was calm and without contention. It appears that this year's budget should garner voter approval without a fuss.
League of Women Voters of Scarsdale Comments on the Proposed School Budget 2017-18 March 27, 2017
The League of Women Voters of Scarsdale (the "League") annually welcomes members of the Board of Education (the "Board") and District Administration (the "Administration") to participate in a panel at the League's General Membership School Budget Information Meeting, this year held on March 20, 2017 at Village Hall and open to the public. The League acknowledges with appreciation the substantial time and effort that goes into developing the proposed Budget and thanks the Administration and the Board for their additional effort spent in preparation for our meeting. The League believes that the time given for the public to ask questions of the Board and Administration is a particularly valuable service, and offers a unique opportunity for dialogue about community-held priorities and values. This statement reflects the consensus of League members discussed at a League consensus meeting held immediately after the Information Meeting.
The League supports the proposed Scarsdale School District Budget for the 2017-18 school year (the "Budget"), which includes priority investment into well-defined teaching and learning opportunities for Scarsdale students, and recommends that the community vote "yes" to approve this Budget on Tuesday May 16, 2017 at Scarsdale Middle School. However, the League notes that our budget study1 does not include a review of the fully articulated budget details as found in the "Budget Book," which was not made available to the community in time for our consensus meeting.
The proposed $153,690,765 budget represents a 2.15% total budget-to-budget increase and overall tax levy growth of 0.96%. The budget includes an overall addition of 6.4 FTE faculty for new literacy, LRC, STEAM, Speech, kindergarten special education, and 1 unassigned position; .2-.4 FTE for a new morning Mandarin teacher in the middle school; 1 new nurse in the high school; and 2 new cleaners.
This year, the allowable tax levy growth under the New York State "Tax Cap" law is 1.55%, so the proposed Budget is .59% or $825,689 below the levy increase permitted by law without a 60% override vote. The Budget proposes use of the 2016-17 fund balance of approximately $2.8 million to cover one- time expenses such as the cost of overruns from the 2014 bond project and also to offset tax increases. The fund balance is available this year because of a decrease in mandated pension contributions due to favorable market conditions, lower-than-estimated utility bills due to decreased fuel costs and a mild winter, and 15 teachers retirements at the end of this school year, permitting lower salaries to replace higher ones. This year, the State property tax equalization rate for Scarsdale changed from 100% to ~89%, causing an increase in the share of the total tax levy Scarsdale residents are responsible for as compared to residents of the Mamaroneck Strip. Based on current estimates, the Town of Scarsdale tax rate for 2017- 18 will increase by 2.76%, while the Town of Mamaroneck's tax rate will decrease by 8.40%. These estimates mean that Scarsdale residents will likely pay ~$15.23 per $1000 of assessed property value, and Mamaroneck Strip residents will pay ~$13.53 per $1000 of assessed property value. We note that there have been years when these percentages have been different, and favored Scarsdale over Mamaroneck.
Noteworthy Budget Features
The League recognizes the use of the Transition Plan as the primary driver of the Budget development. We support the Budget choices that link to educational values as expressed in Education for Tomorrow Set 2.0, that support reflection on teaching and learning, including:
• Adherence to established elementary school class size maximums;
• Maintenance of the SMS house system;
• Commitment to the SHS class size norm that the League understands strive for no more than
12% of classes over 25 students, and scheduling practices that support student choice in
course selection and teacher availability for one-on-one student-teacher interaction;
• New curriculum growth in areas such as elementary literacy, K-12 STEAM programs, including
coding and making classes, expansion of hands-on science learning and expanded technology
• Ongoing commitment to special education offerings that meet the needs of more students with
disabilities and learning differences in-District;
• Hire of a second nurse in the high school;
• Funding of certain stated PTA values, including security and sustainability programs.
The League also supports the Budget items that maintain long-term fiscal health, such as:
• Regular planned investment into the budget focus areas defined by the Transition Plan2 that have their own funding goals, and can 'smooth out' spending over time to avoid one-time expenses that may surprise;
• Funding of reserves that provide for a 'rainy day' and help to secure the District's Aaa bond
• Maintenance of the self-insured health care program that has saved the District [an estimated] $7
million over the past five years, as compared to Empire, according to District calculations.
The League recommends that revenues and expenses that are not part of a budget document but are important components of a district financial plan be provided as an addendum to the budget document. This addendum would list gifts from the Scarsdale Schools Education Foundation, PTAs, local organizations as well as individuals.
State Imposed Tax Levy Limit (the 'tax cap')
The League reiterates our continued support of the Administration and the Board's stated policy of not budgeting to the state-calculated tax cap. Though we understand that the arbitrary "line" created by the tax cap law requires 60% voter approval for override, and thus is necessary to be addressed during the budget development process, the League does not think the cap should be the standard by which the Board measures its fiduciary duty to the community.
The League recommends the Board and Administration continue to resist using the tax cap as a single- point guiding metric. We recommend you present metrics going further back in Scarsdale budgeting history, when budget growth reflected prudent and justifiable investments that at times were higher than the '2%' limit, which is a misnomer. Educating the community in this way will be critical to getting the necessary approval if and when the Board must request an override of the tax cap to ensure the quality of a Scarsdale education.
Capital Investment and Budget Cuts
The League reiterates our recommendation for regular, planned investment for capital improvements, and commends the Administration and the Board for committing funding for capital improvements in this year's operating Budget. However, after years of underfunding during recession years, the League wonders if cuts made to capital projects during Budget Study Session 4 on March 13th constitute a missed opportunity to chip away at what we understand is a significant backlog of capital needs. The League encourages the Board and the Administration to question the rationales and reconsider the reductions made to certain ongoing capital maintenance projects that we assume are priority; such as, but not limited to, the SMS faculty bathrooms, the asbestos abatement program, replacing aging computer monitors and the second (field) stairs replacement project at Fox Meadow (which might see an efficiency of scale benefit if completed simultaneously.)
The League values teacher excellence as critical to Scarsdale's educational success and commends the Administration's work to build on a faculty culture that promotes reflection and welcomes 'authentic feedback.' With an influx of new teachers to the District, the League applauds funding for professional development, focusing on special programs that buttress, mentor and even showcase new faculty in constructive and exciting ways. The League understands the clarification made during the League presentation that State tenure law does not permit the District to mandate that teachers with tenure participate in District-provided professional development offerings. We hope, just the same that the Administration will encourage all teachers to recognize the value of lifelong learning as vital to maintaining the highest standards of the profession. We encourage the District to continue to make professional development attractive, attainable and appropriate for all faculty members. The League supports the efforts by the Administration in each of our seven schools to create a culture where teachers welcome feedback and are encouraged to regularly reflect on and enrich their own effectiveness.
We commend the Administration and, in particular Assistant Superintendent Mattey, on the clear and comprehensive presentations, starting last December and continuing through the four Budget Sessions, outlining the 2017-18 budget development. However, we note that the budget presentations at the December 12, 2016, Board meeting, or the two in January, were not listed as such on the Board calendar.
The League recommends that the Board of Education calendar reflect all the Budget presentations throughout the budget development process and identify them as part of the
The question of how the Board and Administration solicit input and interpret community values during budget analysis remains, for the second year, a League concern. This year, like last year, the Budget season includes just this one community forum, a week before the Board is scheduled to vote on the Budget. The full Budget Book was made available only after the League's informational session and consensus meeting. Although residents are permitted to comment during every Board meeting, there is no opportunity for dialogue with the Administration or Board, and the League is not aware of any formal or informal processes by which the Administration or Board proactively solicits input from the community on issues related to the budget during its development.
The League recommends that the Administration and Board identify new ways to proactively solicit community input during the budget development process-- not just in the form of formal question submission. The League would welcome the restoration of an additional community forum, earlier in the process that offers the community direct Q+A opportunities with the Administration and the Board. Further, we recommend that the Budget Book be made available, albeit in draft form, in January for both the Board and the community.
The League recognizes that the Budget development process has changed over the last few years and we are trying to change our approach to studying the Budget so that we most effectively inform our membership and the community and offer the Board and the Administration thorough and considered recommendations. We believe our voice has value to your process and recommend that the Administration and Board work with the League this spring while setting calendars, in order to help us realign our study protocol with current budget development practice. Further, we recommend that the Board consider designating a Board Liaison to the League to better facilitate communication with our League School Budget committee.
Communications, Next Steps
The League commends last year's development of plans for District communications, but recognizes that Scarsdale residents are busy people, and as such, don't often 'tune in' to school issues until they are either personally pressing or the issue has grown fully adversarial. There are pending issues on the horizon, such as: determining the best use of mandated and contractually negotiated increases in classroom time; prioritizing district-wide capital needs that will be detailed in the long-awaited Facilities Master Plan; resolving the scope of the Greenacres School project plans; confirming assumptions for use of the upcoming debt service drop off; delivering a long range financial plan; and creating the next iteration of the District's multi-year 'Transition Plan.' The League foresees the need for the broader community to engage in constructive ways that go beyond the loudest voices at the microphone. The League commends the Board for its encouragement of written communication to the Board and the stated commitment to respond to all incoming correspondence, but we wonder how the Board then identifies, analyzes, integrates and communicates any trends found in these private correspondences as part of transparent decision- making practices.
The League recommends that the Administration and Board find ways to engage early interest in District issues, actively seek input from stakeholders to identify the range of community sentiment, create spaces for dialogue, offer greater agency to stakeholders and build solid buy-in when needed.3 The League further recommends that any established Board protocols for community interaction be made publicly known.
Advocacy for District Values in the State and Federal Landscape:
The League understands that State and Federal policies impact the district in ways that do not always reflect our own community values or serve our students' best interests. The League reiterates our concerns that challenges from the State and the Federal government continue to undermine the local democratic processes that have allowed Scarsdale community values to shape our public school system. The League thanks the Administration and Board for their commitment to Political Outreach as part of the Transition Plan, and encourages more regular reports that inform the community on issues facing the District in the wider public education landscape, particularly in the areas of unfunded mandates, State testing, teacher evaluation mandates such as APPR, and on issues of State Aid. The League encourages the Board's ongoing interactions with our local lawmakers, New York State Regents, regional and state school boards associations, and other education advocacy organizations.
The League reiterates our recommendation that the Board and Administration take on a greater role in advocacy and leadership for our District and for public school in general.
Thank you for your consideration of the League's report.
School Budget Study Chair
League of Women Voters of Scarsdale
League of Women Voters of Scarsdale
Scarsdale PTC EC Comments - 2017/18 Proposed School Budget
Hi. I'm Claudine Gecel, one of the Scarsdale School's PT Council Budget Chairs. I'd also like to introduce two new Budget Chairs, Susan Lee-Foley and Wendy Huo. Tonight, we'd like to commend the School Board, the District Administration, and all the other hard-working staff who contributed to this year's organized, transparent budgeting process. And of course, we welcome the opportunity to comment!
As parents of school-aged children, we appreciate the efforts made by members of the BOE, and the District Administration, to present a financially responsible budget - One with a tax levy increase of less than 1%, and a budget-to-budget increase of 2.15%. Despite the fact that roughly 80% of our school budget is determined by outside forces, we believe this budget provides for an excellent public education - both for today and tomorrow. The Scarsdale PT Council's Executive Committee firmly supports this budget, and encourages the community to vote on May 16th, 2017.
That said, there are a few points we'd like to highlight:
1.) To further our shared value of maintaining established class size practices, and to ensure that students of all learning styles are able to access the general curriculum, we support the decision to add 2.5 Reading Teachers, and an additional .5 (half-time) Special Education Teacher to the Elementary Schools. We also support adding a second School Nurse, and a dedicated part-time Speech Pathologist, to the High School.
2.) The Council Executive Committee also supports the hiring of an additional STEAM teacher, for the High School, to continue last year's efforts of expanding our STEAM offerings. Likewise, we endorse the revitalization of a District-Wide Sustainability Committee that will include District Employees, Parents, and Students. The Council continues to support Sustainability Initiatives that promote Environmentally Responsible behavior.
3.) The Committee also understands that the District has postponed many Capital Projects during this past economic downturn. While the District has several Long Term Bonds coming due, building an annual budget which begins addressing Long-Neglected Facilities Issues should make everyone feel better about the health and safety of the buildings where our children learn. We're also glad to hear the District is working with a safety consultant. We urge the Board to ensure that the consultant's recommendations have the required funding.
Once again, the PT Council Executive Committee supports this budget in its current form, and also thanks the Board of Education, and the District Administration, for being responsible stewards of our financial resources.
Thanks so much for your time and attention!
320 Students Participate in the Annual Speech Contest at SMS
- Category: Schools
- Published on 05 April 2017
- Written by Josie Blatt
Scarsdale Middle School students learned the power of oratory at the annual Speech Contest on Wednesday, March 22, 2017, with 320 seventh and eighth graders participating in the event. Their moving presentations ranged from personal stories of the loss of a parent to global issues such the Syrian refugee crisis.
The event was the culmination of weeks of activity. Throughout the month of March, every seventh and eighth grade student works on writing and/or performing a speech in their English class. Students select one of six categories of speeches: Oratorical Declamation, Personal Experience, Original Oratory, Poetic Interpretation, Dramatic Interpretation, and Humorous Presentation. After memorizing and performing their speeches for their English classes, students can opt to compete in the Speech Contest.
At the Speech Contest, speakers compete in two preliminary rounds with 6 to 8 students in each room, judged by 2 to 4 judges who give scores from 0-100. Students with the highest scores advance to the final round of their category, with 5 students in each final round. In the final round, judges rank the finalists from 1 to 5, one being the student whom they think should win. The winner from each category performed in an assembly for the entire Middle School on Monday, March 27, 2017. Judges were parent volunteers, previous finalists of the contest who are now in high school or college, and members of the SHS Speech and Debate team.
Approximately one third of contest participants this year competed in the category of Oratorical Declamation. In this category, students select speeches that have already been given. Then, they write a brief introduction and perform the speech, interpreting it in their own way. Oratorical Declamation is the newest category, having been added to the Speech Contest in 2014. This year, honorable mention went to Natalie Schonfeld (Popham 8), tied for third place were James Klein (Fountain 8) and Justine Karp (Butler 7), second place went to Natalie Dowd (Cooper 8), and first place went to Katie Berdon (Cooper 8). Berdon's winning speech was holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel's "Perils of Indifference", an address he delivered at the White House in 1999. In her introduction, Berdon noted, "I was struck by the parallels between his plight from all those years ago, and the Syrian refugee crisis happening today."
In the category of Personal Experience, students write their own speeches, presenting a story about an impactful experience in his or her life. Honorable mentions went to Alan Zeng (Popham 8) and Jacob Haftel (Popham 8), tied for second place were Lucas Seiffert (Popham 8) and Eric Rodriguez (Popham 8), and the winner was Danielle Eforo (Cooper 8). In her speech, Eforo told the tragic story of the loss of her father when she was 9 years old, and how it impacted her life. Eforo's father was a volunteer firefighter, an EMT, and a social worker. Danielle said, "I decided I needed to help people, just like how my dad did. I started to stick up for my friends when they were teased, I ran bake sales for fundraising, I donated my clothes, I even signed up for a community service organization called Lion's heart."
Original Oratory is another category in which the speakers write their own speeches. Students select a topic they are passionate about, and write and deliver an informative, persuasive speech. In the contest, honorable mentions went to Adam Wasserman (Popham 8) and Samantha Kefer (Fountain 8), third place went to Jacob Rosewater (Cooper 8), second place went to Simran Ruta (Popham 8), and first place went to Alexa Doyle (Fountain 8). Doyle's winning speech argued that we must allow Syrian refugees to enter our country. Doyle made effective use of the ability to present images on a slideshow in this category. She showed the tragic photograph of 5 year-old Omran Daqneesh, a Syrian boy who was rescued from a building hit by an airstrike. Doyle questioned, "Many of you are here today because of America letting in your ancestors in the 1800s and 1900s. And now because of that, we are a bigger, better, and stronger nation. Our country was built off of refugees, so why are we closing our doors to the people who need us the most now?"
In the category of Poetic Interpretation, students select one long poem, a section of a novel written in verse, or several shorter poems to perform and interpret in their own way. This year, honorable mention went to Dylan Tuchman (Popham 8), tied for third place were Emily Yacoub (Butler 8) and Andrea Cardiel (Fountain 8), second place went to Karen Lee (Popham 8), and the winner was Mia de la Fuente-Akersveen (CHOICE). Fuente-Akersveen performed "Today Means Amen" by Sierra DeMulder. The poem is an uplifting spoken word poem that emphasizes the importance of every person in the world. In her introduction, Mia said, "Spoken word poetry is a rather new form of literature that had yet to be explored. It discusses so many topics and it truly is a beautiful art form."
Dramatic Interpretation is similar to Poetic Interpretation. However instead of performing poems, students perform an excerpt from a novel, a short story, or a play, and embody the characters from their selection. The excerpts can be serious or humourous. Honorable mentions this year went to Aanya Schoetz (Butler 8) and Kate Rosier (Cooper 8), third place went to Vivian Guo (Popham 8), second place went to Cooper Cohen (Fountain 8), and first place went to Danielle Degani (Popham 8). Degani's excerpt was from the play "The Prisoner of Second Avenue" by Neil Simon. Degani embodied the character Edna, who just found out she had been robbed. In her introduction, Degani explained, "Edna is baffled by the fact that she has been robbed, because she was only gone for five minutes."
In the category of Humorous Presentation, students write and perform comedic speeches about topics that everyone can laugh about. Honorable mentions went to Benjamin Koch (Butler 8) and Katherine Barlow (Butler 7), tied for second place were Zachary Loeser (Cooper 8) and Thomas Gibney (Butler 7), and the winner was Joshua Bock (Butler 8). The topic of Bock's winning speech was social media. Bock summed up posting on social media in these comedic lines: "So here's how it works. First, you find something to post that people actually care about. In the unlikely event that you get past that first stage, now you have to find a caption. This is done by locking yourself in a dark room for an hour and trying to think of clever puns, even though in the end you know you're just gonna settle for a hashtag and call it a day."
The contest was run by Fountain 8 Social Studies Teacher Will Maldarelli, and Computer Teacher Doug Rose.
This article was written by Josie Blatt, a senior at Scarsdale High School and a member of the Speech and Debate team.
Chris Morin and Scott Silberfein Nominated to Serve Second Terms on the Scarsdale School Board
- Category: Schools
- Published on 20 March 2017
- Written by Joanne Wallenstein
Wendy Gendel, Chair of the 2017 School Board Nominating Committee (SBNC) announced today, March 20, 2017, that the committee has re-nominated Chris Morin and Scott Silberfein to serve second three-year terms on the Scarsdale Board of Education. If elected on May 16, 2017 the two will begin their second terms on July 1.
According to a press release from Gendel, the non-partisan SBNC is a committee comprised of 30 voting members and 4 non-voting members, all of whom are residents of the Scarsdale School District. The thirty voting members serve staggered 3-year terms and are elected directly by the residents of their election units, which correspond to the five elementary school neighborhoods. The 4 non-voting members consist of a Chair and Vice Chair who are selected from the previous year's graduating voting members, and one appointee each from the Scarsdale Forum and the Confederation of Scarsdale Neighborhood Association Presidents (SNAP). Collectively, the SBNC undertakes the process of recruiting and vetting prospective candidates to serve as members on the Board of Education.
Over the course of Sunday meetings from January through March, this year's SBNC interviewed and conducted detailed due diligence on all applicants. Through thoughtful discussion and careful consideration, and pursuant to the SBNC Resolution, the SBNC then judges and selects individuals "solely on their qualifications to serve the community." This resulted in the nomination of Morin and Silberfein.
Discussing the process, SBNC Chair Gendel said, "I am incredibly proud to have served the SBNC and our community in this capacity. I thank the entire SBNC Board and all applicants for their hard work these past months and their unwavering commitment to ensuring that the Scarsdale School system remains among the finest in the country."
Commenting on the news, Scott Silberfein said, "I am excited and privileged to have received the nomination of the SBNC to serve a second term on the Scarsdale Board of Education. Serving our community in this way has been and continues to be an honor. If elected, I look forward to the opportunity to continue to support and build upon the good work of our district's administration and teachers in partnership with all of our community's stakeholders in providing the best possible education for all of the district's children, now and in the future."
For more information on the SBNC, including the governing resolution, information on the nonpartisan system, and a list of the current SBNC members, please visit the SBNC website or contact the SBNC Chair.
Residents are reminded to vote on Tuesday, May 16, 2017 in the school board election, the same day as the 2017-2018 school budget vote.