Wednesday, Feb 21st

Last updateWed, 21 Feb 2018 7pm

You are here: Home Letters to the Editor An Open Letter to Scarsdale from Diane Greenwald
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

An Open Letter to Scarsdale from Diane Greenwald

letter-to-the-editorDear Neighbors and Friends:
As many seem to know, my name has recently been used in an email outreach that went to many in town. I was oddly quoted out of context in order to assign me a position I have never publicly expressed. This email also disparages exceptional civic organizations like the League of Women Voters and sincere advocacy groups, like the Greenacres Taskforce, uses nasty language about the hard-working Joanne
Wallenstein while simultaneously informing about Bob Berg's support of the school bond and as a candidate for Village Trustee. This email was sent by an anonymous author to many in the community without their explicit opt-in. (If you got this email without opt-in, you can contact Constant Contact to complain.)

Whomever that author or authors were -- that person/s is informed about and supportive of Bob Berg running outside the non-partisan system, as a 'Voters Choice Party' candidate for Village Trustee. The email seems to promote Bob Berg and make his support for this school bond into a campaign issue.

This is not the first time that emails have been received in our community from made-up email addresses with a somewhat familiar sound to other legitimate groups, with inflammatory language and even confidential knowledge in support of Bob Berg and/or the Voters Choice Party. In this case, the assumptions made by this author/s are staggering and their tone is unwelcome.

Several in town have reached out to me to assure me their group did not distribute this email - and I believe and appreciate it. If you know who did this, please speak up. This level of discourse has to change; we have to do this better.

Today is School Bond vote day. I am not going to recommend how you vote today -- just that you do vote and that you are informed and wary of hyperbole in any direction.

I have the upmost respect for those in the community -- the PTA, The League, the Vote Yes Groups, the Vote No Groups, -- who carefully study, engage, listen, learn and make a statement. Take a stand. Advocacy is a welcome right and privilege of democracy. But in a civil society, let's do it without denigrating the other side. Because tomorrow we all have to get along.

Here is my thinking:
If this bond passes, everyone should be happy for school investment and everyone should stay involved, for there is still work to be done. The District remains accountable for their use of this money and all should stay vigilant. Be hopeful; investment can yield positive outcomes.

To District Leadership I say: there are many disenfranchised who should be included and there is community building to do. Please acknowledge missteps and even mistakes. Please be open to fix many of the bumps and concerns in the community. Make time for that.

If the bond fails everyone should try again. There is no indication in Scarsdale that this is the end; it would be a serious moment that will require careful listening and a new approach.

To District Leadership I say: Take a step back, take a good look around and change something about the approach to get to a different result. There are many in the community who are committed to school investment and will welcome new outcomes to capture their buy in. We can all consider this an opportunity -- yes a new draft can be exhausting but it can also represent improvement.

Bob Berg is certainly persistent and while I wish him luck on his campaign, if the aforementioned email is any indication of his and his supporters' approach to the community dialogue, it is unwelcome.

In any case, I am not convinced that the non-partisan system, which could likely use improvement, is so broken as to be discarded. I believe the vetting system and the civil intent of the non-partisan process remains worth trusting. Looking at the exceptional and varied candidates selected this year for Village Trustee: Jane Veron, Lena Crandall and Justin Arest, I will stick with them. I will put my name on it.

Respectfully submitted,
Diane Greenwald

chilepepperArticle has become too hot to handle. If you want to post a comment, include your real name and street address.

Comments   

#20 Mark Kane 2018-02-14 16:57
Very interesting that one group sent out hit emails on Mr Berg when he was running for voters choice. And now another email, maybe it was sent by the same group - reverse psychology?
Quote
#19 Jane Curley 7 Hamilton Road 2018-02-09 22:53
I don't know who Diane Greenwald is, but I think she owes me and at least 1000 others an apology. I am one of the over 1000 residents who supported Bob Berg last year, and I continue to support him. I did not write an anonymous email. #NotMe.
Quote
#18 Another Resident 2018-02-09 14:52
I’d like to hear from Bob Berg himself on this. It’s the right thing to give him the opportunity to respond.


Quoting Resident:
I hope we hear from Bob on this. If not, I think we know what to conclude.


Quoting To Bob:
Bob,

If you’d like to take this opportunity to affirmatively state that no one associated with the Voters Choice Party was responsible for that email, then please take this opportunity to do so. Otherwise, I think the situation is pretty clear.
Quote
#17 For the police? 2018-02-09 14:48
An unsolicited email like this could be a matter of law. I wonder if the Scarsdale Police can be enlisted to request from ConstantContact the name of whoever used their credit card to send this?

Furthermore, there are a limited number of folk with access to a list that would include as many people as received this email. Or they stole it...

Before rushing to judgment, this could have been a spoiler email intended to not support Berg but to associate him negatively with this campaign. So let's not rush to indict him as part of this.
Quote
#16 Bob Selvaggio 2018-02-09 14:08
"Resident" wants to know about the "inner circle" of the Voters Choice group. I guess I would be considered "inner circle" and until reading her post I don't recall ever reading anything about Ms. Greenwald -- surely nothing negative that would come to mind. I also know nothing of the email in question. While I believe her attack on VCP is misinformed and unfortunate I could not agree more with her statement that "Advocacy is a welcome right and privilege of democracy. But in a civil society, let's do it without denigrating the other side." Let's do debate the issues, respect those with differing points of view and try hard to assume positive intent. Although some may find this surprising, that's exactly what we eight candidates did last year.
Quote
#15 StopGossiping 2018-02-09 12:50
No one in the VCP was involved in the email Ms. Greenwald claims was sent. She repeatedly advocated for a new school. And now she claims that was not her position. I find it interesting that she lectures residents on how we should be civil and then attacks Mr. Berg. Ms. Greenwald praises the SCNP candidates, but she neglects to mention that her husband is in the Citizens Nominating Committee who picked these three people. Disclosing biases and conflicts of interest is important.

Quoting Resident:
Note that Bob uses careful wording and does NOT say that the inner circle of the Voters Choice Party was not involved in the email.
Quote
#14 Resident 2018-02-09 10:33
Note that Bob uses careful wording and does NOT say that the inner circle of the Voters Choice Party was not involved in the email.
Quote
#13 Resident 2018-02-09 10:09
I hope we hear from Bob on this. If not, I think we know what to conclude.


Quoting To Bob:
Bob,

If you’d like to take this opportunity to affirmatively state that no one associated with the Voters Choice Party was responsible for that email, then please take this opportunity to do so. Otherwise, I think the situation is pretty clear.
Quote
#12 Jack Greenspan 2018-02-09 02:50
I completely agree. We need a constructive dialogue to town issues, not destructive rhetoric. This unsolicited email is not a good harbinger for the tone of community discussion going forward.
Quote
#11 Disgusted FM Resident 2018-02-09 02:22
Diane, you do not owe anyone an apology. Your dignified response to the shameless use of your name was appropriate. I personally believe your suspicions are justified, and the source of this trash and hyperbole is a neighbor of mine who is very closely aligned with the Voters Choice Party. I will personally follow up with Constant Contact to try to confirm the source of the trash.
Quote

Add comment

first
  
last
 
 
start
stop