Wednesday, Jun 19th

Last update:10:25:42 PM GMT

You are here: The Community Edgemont Residents Call For Feiner's Resignation
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

Edgemont Residents Call For Feiner's Resignation

E-mail Print PDF

feinerIn the wake of the Fortress Bible Church decision against the Town of Greenburgh, the Board of the Edgemont Community Council is calling for the resignation of Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner and Town Councilwoman Diana Juettner.

In September 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a decision that found that the Town of Greenburgh violated the constitutional rights of the Fortress Bible Church in its effort to build a new sanctuary and school off Dobbs Ferry Road in Hartsdale. The Church purchased the property in 1998 and the Town blocked its effort to move ahead for years with zoning and traffic safety challenges and illegal demands for a fire truck or a cash payment to gain approval. The court found that the Town destroyed evidence and acted in bad faith. They also said that Feiner’s testimony during the trial was “not credible.”

The Church is seeking $5 to $6 million in damages and the Town’s insurance carrier informed them that it would not cover damages arising out of willful legal violations.

Feiner has served as Town Supervisor for 21 years and this court decision is not the first to raise the ire of Edgemont residents who have been sparring with him for years over a wide range of issues.

Here are a few of these additional issues:

westhelp
Westhelp now stands empty

Edgemont residents have charged that they are paying unnecessarily high real estate taxes to finance duplicate services within the unincorporated areas of the Town of Greenburgh.

Residents also contend that Feiner has failed to rent out 108 apartments at Westhelp, losing the Town of Greenburgh at least $1 million a year.

In another recently filed lawsuit, a group of Greenburgh residents are objecting to Feiner’s proposal to lease the former site of Frank’s Nursery to Game On to build a 94,000 square foot indoor sports facility. They argue that the lease violates County law that states that property acquired through foreclosure must be sold and they are also calling for a full environmental review of the property which may be contaminated due to pesticide use by the nursery. Feiner has announced a Town-wide referendum on the lease despite the questionable legality of renting the property.

gameon365
Rendering for proposed Game On 365 facility

 

Below is a copy of the letter from the Board of the Directors of the Edgemont Community Council calling for the resignations of Feiner and Juettner. Learn more about issues concerning Edgemont here.

October 23, 2012
Town Supervisor Paul Feiner and Town Councilwoman Diana Juettner
From: The Board of Directors, ECC
Re: Your Resignations due to your actions regarding Fortress Bible Mr. Feiner and Ms. Juettner,

On October 1st, the ECC's Board of Directors met and unanimously voted to ask for your resignations due to your actions regarding the Fortress Bible Church. As the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit wrote in unanimously affirming the district court's decision against the Town:

The district court found that Town staff, including at least one Board member, had intentionally destroyed discoverable evidence despite specific instructions not to do so.

The district court's comprehensive findings demonstrate that the Town disingenuously used SEQRA to obstruct and ultimately deny the Church's project.

We find sufficient evidence . . . to support the district court's finding . . . that the Town was acting in bad faith and in hostility to the project such that it would not have allowed the Church to build any worship facility and school.

The Town attempted to extort from the Church a payment in lieu of taxes, it ignored and then replaced its Planning Commissioner when he advocated on the Church's behalf, and Town staff intentionally destroyed relevant evidence.

… we conclude that on the record before us there was no rational basis for the Town's actions.

The original judgment of the district court followed a 26-day trial, during which Mr. Feiner testified and the judge found Mr. Feiner's testimony, particularly with regard to his supposed concerns about "traffic safety" to be "not credible." The district court also found that Town officials, including Mr. Feiner and Ms. Juettner had, through their actions over a period of years intentionally violated the constitutional rights of the church, in violation of the church's rights to religious freedom under the First Amendment and to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and that, as a direct, immediate, and reasonably foreseeable consequence, their actions will cost Greenburgh taxpayers millions of dollars in damages, none of which, because their actions involved intentional violations of federal law, will be covered by insurance.

As you may know, New York State Public Officers Law Section 36 provides for the removal by a court of elected town officials "for any misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in office." The cases in New York that have interpreted this statute state that removal from office under this statute requires a showing of either "self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust." See Salvadaor v. Ross, 61

A.D.23d 1163 (3d Dep't 2009). In the Fortress Bible case, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed findings that Mr. Feiner and Ms. Juettner engaged in intentional wrongdoing in violation of the constitutional rights of a church, resulting in millions of dollars in damages. Such conduct clearly meets the requirements for removal from office under Public Officers Law Section 36.

Please do Greenburgh the ultimate service and resign from your posts.

This continued, willful misuse of the power of your positions is a terrible detriment to the community and should not continue.

For the Board of Directors,
Geoff LoftusPresident,
Edgemont Community Council

 

Comments (8)Add Comment
0
...
written by TR, November 01, 2012
RECALL ELECTIONS ARE POSSIBLE!
0
...
written by ECC should do more, October 26, 2012
to white guy
because no one runs against him.
the town board spends 99% of its time on matters involving unincorporated greenburgh so that basically precludes anyone from the villages running for supervisor. ms berger of dobbs ferry tried a few years ago and was trounced.

outside of edgemont, unincorporated greenburgh is fairly balkanized and essentially consists of 19 or so "neighborhoods" that have little to do with each other and are not unified by either status of being a village or a stellar school system as is found in edgemont and the river villages like hastings and ardsley.

the case against feiner and his enablers like juettner and sheehan is strong but the nature of greenburgh itself (villages vs. unincorporated, lack of political cohesion, the very fact that no one outside of ken jones (a town board member who also walks and talks the feiner line) has a greenburgh post office address) makes it very difficult for a candidate to emerge who might appeal to all of these different interests. Feiner has found success by pandering to each little interest group (such as the mayfair knollwood section of greenburgh where he shut down the low income housing site (and illegally sent money to its school district) or in fairview where he keeps the community center running) while pursuing a village first policy (where most of the votes are) all to the detriment of the unincorporated areas which will have to pay for the fortress bible fiasco because it arises out of a zoning and planning decsion of the unincorporated area.

so unless there is a candidate who can truly represent everyone in the town on an equitable basis, feiner is the supervisor for life unless he is removed by court order.

0
...
written by ECC should do more, October 26, 2012
to white guy
because no one runs against him.
the town board spends 99% of its time on matters involving unincorporated greenburgh so that basically precludes anyone from the villages running for supervisor. ms berger of dobbs ferry tried a few years ago and was trounced.

outside of edgemont, unincorporated greenburgh is fairly balkanized and essentially consists of 19 or so "neighborhoods" that have little to do with each other and are not unified by either status of being a village or a stellar school system as is found in edgemont and the river villages like hastings and ardsley.

the case against feiner and his enablers like juettner and sheehan is strong but the nature of greenburgh itself (villages vs. unincorporated, lack of political cohesion, the very fact that no one outside of ken jones (a town board member who also walks and talks the feiner line) has a greenburgh post office address) makes it very difficult for a candidate to emerge who might appeal to all of these different interests. Feiner has found success by pandering to each little interest group (such as the mayfair knollwood section of greenburgh where he shut down the low income housing site (and illegally sent money to its school district) or in fairview where he keeps the community center running) while pursuing a village first policy (where most of the votes are) all to the detriment of the unincorporated areas which will have to pay for the fortress bible fiasco because it arises out of a zoning and planning decsion of the unincorporated area.

so unless there is a candidate who can truly represent everyone in the town on an equitable basis, feiner is the supervisor for life unless he is removed by court order.

0
...
written by Fed Up, October 26, 2012
There should be a Federal investigation into the activities of the Greenburgh Town government.
0
...
written by Fed Up, October 26, 2012
Isn't it curious that only the Edgemont portion of Greenburgh is onto this guy? With some exceptions, no one else in Greenburgh seems to care about what goes on; some are getting fat off of his largesse and the rest are asleep.

The really scary thought is that the current issues may only be the tip of the proverbial iceberg (how about the recent admissions about the water district).

There should be a Federal investigation into the activities of the Town government.
0
...
written by White Guy, October 25, 2012
How is this guy always re-elected???
0
...
written by ECC should do more, October 25, 2012
the ECC should also be calling for term limits
mr feiner and ms juettner have been in office for 2 decades yet the longer they stay in office the worse they perform.
Further the ECC should be calling for the creation of representative districts in the town as opposed to election of town council members at large.

None of the members of the town board are from Edgemont or live anywhere near Edgemont

Of course, the other alternative is incorporation but support for that approach has not not been well received.
wjilw
0
...
written by not a lawyer but..., October 25, 2012
how can "the town" destroy evidence ? Shouldn't an individual have to be held legally accountable at some point ?????

Write comment

busy
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop